Richard F. Wetzell

Mark Roseman

Devin O. Pendas

The 'racial state' has become a familiar shorthand for the Third Reich, encapsulating its raison d'être, ambitions, and the underlying logic of its genocidal violence. The Nazi racial state's agenda is generally understood as a fundamental reshaping of society based on a new hierarchy of racial value. However, this volume argues that it is time to reappraise what race really meant under Nazism, and to question and complicate its relationship to the Nazis' agenda, actions, and appeal. Based on a wealth of new research, the contributors show that racial knowledge and racial discourse in Nazi Germany were far more contradictory and disparate than we have come to assume. They shed new light on the ways that racial policy worked and was understood, and consider race's function, content, and power in relation to society and nation, and above all, in relation to the extraordinary violence unleashed by the Nazis.

Rethinking Nazi Germany

Beyond the Racial State

Sybille Steinbacher

Johannes Schmidt

Auschwitz steht emblematisch für das deutsche Menschheitsverbrechen. Rechtshistorisch und gesellschaftspolitisch war der erste Frankfurter Auschwitz-Prozess das bedeutendste NS-Verfahren in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. 2013 jährt sich die "Strafsache gegen Mulka u.a." zum 50. Mal. In einführenden Abhandlungen legen Sybille Steinbacher (Wien) und Devin O. Pendas (Boston) die Geschichte des Lagers und des Prozesses dar. Die in der zweibändigen Edition publizierten Quellen (Anklageschrift, Eröffnungsbeschluss, Urteil, Revisionsurteil des Bundesgerichtshofs, Urteil in der Neuverhandlung gegen Franz Lucas), mit historischen Anmerkungen und juristischen Erläuterungen versehen, geben Aufschluss über die Anstrengung der Strafjustiz, in einem rechtsstaatlichen Verfahren die individuelle Schuld der Beteiligten am nationalsozialistischen Völkermord nachzuweisen.

Kommentierte Quellenedition

Der Frankfurter Auschwitz-Prozess (1963-1965)

Revising our understanding about how transitional justice works, this study analyses and compares Nazi trials in post-war East and West Germany from 1945 to 1950 to challenge assumptions about the political outcomes of prosecuting mass atrocities.

Democracy, Nazi Trials and Transitional Justice in Germany, 1945–1950

Post-war Germany has been seen as a model of 'transitional justice' in action, where the prosecution of Nazis, most prominently in the Nuremberg Trials, helped promote a transition to democracy. However, this view forgets that Nazis were also prosecuted in what became East Germany, and the story in West Germany is more complicated than has been assumed. Revising received understanding of how transitional justice works, Devin O. Pendas examines Nazi trials between 1945 and 1950 to challenge assumptions about the political outcomes of prosecuting mass atrocities. In East Germany, where there were more trials and stricter sentences, and where they grasped a broad German complicity in Nazi crimes, the trials also helped to consolidate the emerging Stalinist dictatorship by legitimating a new police state. Meanwhile, opponents of Nazi prosecutions in West Germany embraced the language of fairness and due process, which helped de-radicalise the West German judiciary and promote democracy.

Pendas, Devin Owen Pendas

A comprehensive history of the Frankfurt Auschwitz trial.

Genocide, History, and the Limits of the Law

The Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial, 1963-1965

Jens Meierhenrich

From the trial of Socrates to the post-9/11 military commissions, trials have always been useful instruments of politics. Yet there is still much that we do not understand about them. Why do governments use trials to pursue political objectives, and when? What differentiates political trials from ordinary ones? Contrary to conventional wisdom, not all political trials are show trials or contrive to set up scapegoats. This volume offers a novel account of political trials that is empirically rigorous and theoretically sophisticated, linking state-of-the-art research on telling cases to a broad argument about political trials as a socio-legal phenomenon. All the contributors analyse the logic of the political in the courtroom. From archival research to participant observation, and from linguistic anthropology to game theory, the volume offers a genuinely interdisciplinary set of approaches that substantially advance existing knowledge about what political trials are, how they work, and why they matter.

Political Trials in Theory and History

This book presents an empirically rigorous and theoretically sophisticated account of political trials.

Devin O. Pendas

Books

Your next favorite book is out there