James P. Nehf

There is a longstanding debate in the development of consumer policy: whether consumers are better served by regulatory measures that prohibit unwanted marketing practices outright, or by measures that facilitate informed decision making and more efficient consumer markets, letting consumers decide what is best for them. Market-enhancing laws are designed to help consumers make better informed decisions, resulting in more efficient market transactions. A more interventionist approach prohibits contract terms and selling practices that regulators deem unfair and therefore prohibited in all consumer transactions. Although the EU had taken an interventionist approach in other directives, most notably the Directive on Unfair Contract Terms in 1993, the more recent consumer initiative, the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, is primarily a market-regulating measure designed to foster informed choices. Whether the Directive is good or bad for businesses and consumers remains to be seen, a subject addressed in depth by Geraint Howells of the United Kingdom, Hans W. Micklitz of Germany, and Thomas Wilhelmsson of Finland in their extensively researched book, European Fair Trading Law: The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive. This paper is a review of the book and the Directive.

Sweet Sounds and Sour Notes for European Consumers

Harmonizing Trade Practices in the EU

Douglas J. Whaley

"A casebook that takes students through the main issues of consumer law: deceptive practices, product quality, and consumer credit. It covers the Federal Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act (regulating sale of vacation home land -- not mentioned in any other book on this topic), and includes "Quotes for the Attorney's Arsenal" (statements from famous cases that eloquently encapsulate specific points)"--

James P. Nehf

About

Books

Join the club