Mary Douglas

Douglas identifies the concern for purity as a key theme at the heart of every society. In lively and lucid prose she explains its relevance for every reader by revealing its wide-ranging impact on our attitudes to society, values, cosmology and knowledge.

An Analysis of Concept of Pollution and Taboo

Purity and Danger

"Douglas forewarns us that institutions do not think independently, nor do they have purposes, nor do they build themselves. As we construct our institutions, we are squeezing each other's ideas into a common shape in order to prove their legitimacy by sheer numbers. She admonishes us not to take comfort in the thought that primitives may think through institutions, but moderns decide on important issues individually. Our legitimated institutions make major decisions, and these decisions always involve ethical principles."--Publisher description.

How Institutions Think

This is an anthropological work in its widest sense, exploring themes such as the social meaning of natural symbols, and the image of the body in society - issues very much in vogue in anthropology, sociology and cultural studies.

Explorations in Cosmology

Natural Symbols

Essays in Cultural Theory

Risk and Blame

An Essay on Ring Composition (The Terry Lectures Series)

Thinking in Circles

Kurumlar Nasıl Düşünür?

Baron Isherwood

Il mondo delle cose. Oggetti, valori, consumo

'No more sparkling and suggestive work of social science is likely to appear in the near future. This book provides a splendid answer as to why anthropology goes on mattering and also to why no surgery can separate it from sociology '-The Economist from the reviews of the first edition This new edition of a classic work provides an excellent introduction to the thought of anthropologist Mary Douglas. First published to great acclaim in 1975, Mary Douglas has now revised the text to include additional chapters and a new introduction. Implicit Meaningsincludes writings on the key themes which are associated with Mary Douglas's work and which have had a major influence on anthropological thought, such as: *food *pollution *risk *animals *myth. Among the new pieces inluded in this edition are: The Lele of the Kasai * Techniques of Socrcery Control in Central Africa * The Lele Revisited * Obituary of Godfrey Lienhardt * The Depolitzation of Risk * Rightness of Categories

Selected Essays in Anthropology

Implicit Meanings

Paru en 1979 sous le titre " The World of Goods ", pour la première fois disponible en français, cet ouvrage d'une des plus grandes anthropologues du XXe siècle, disparue en 2007, et co-écrit avec un économiste, fonde le champ de l'anthropologie de la consommation par le regard original qu'il pose sur nos conduites de consommation et les échanges marchands. En s'interrogeant sur les motifs qui nous poussent à désirer des objets, à les acquérir, à dépenser ou épargner, et plus largement sur notre rapport à la consommation, il propose une approche résolument inédite de la façon dont les individus et les communautés forgent et projettent des significations, de la valeur, voire une éthique, sur les " biens " de consommation. En ce sens, l'achat apparaît comme une modalité permettant aux individus de déployer des rituels de consommation qui donnent sens tant à ce qu'ils sont qu'à ce qu'ils font. Avec pour fonction essentielle d'établir des systèmes complexes de relations sociales, les biens de consommation répondent à des logiques et des catégories qui dessinent des flux alors représentatifs de la société dans laquelle ils prennent formes. Loin d'être juste une façon de se comporter qui se grefferait à un modèle social existant, l'acte de consommer appelle un modèle de vie enserré dans un ensemble de pratiques fortement socialisées.

le monde des biens

Pour une anthropologie de la consommation

The Adventures of Nansen and Peary on the Great Ice-cap

Across Greenland's Ice-fields

Cultural Bias

Professor Mary Douglas

Purity and Danger is acknowledged as a modern masterpiece of anthropology. It is widely cited in non-anthropological works and gave rise to a body of application, rebuttal and development within anthropology. In 1995 the book was included among the Times Literary Supplement's hundred most influential non-fiction works since WWII. Incorporating the philosophy of religion and science and a generally holistic approach to classification, Douglas demonstrates the relevance of anthropological enquiries to an audience outside her immediate academic circle. She offers an approach to understanding rules of purity by examining what is considered unclean in various cultures. She sheds light on the symbolism of what is considered clean and dirty in relation to order in secular and religious, modern and primitive life.

An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo

Purezza e pericolo. Un'analisi dei concetti di contaminazione e tabù

Purity and danger : an analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo by Mary Douglas (1966).

An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo

First published in 1992, this volume follows on from the programme for studying risk and blame that was implied in Purity and Danger. The first half of the book Douglas argues that the study of risk needs a systematic framework of political and cultural comparison. In the latter half she examines questions in cultural theory. Through the eleven essays contained in Risk and Blame, Douglas argues that the prominence of risk discourse will force upon the social sciences a programme of rethinking and consolidation that will include anthropological approaches.

Nansen's crossing in 1888 and Peary's north Greenland expedition in 1891-92.

We are often tyrannized by cooking styles and dress fashions but the idea of thought styles in control is less familiar and perhaps more disturbing. But how do thought styles work? In these fascinating essays Mary Douglas brings the topic down to the commonplace judgements of everyday life.

Critical Essays on Good Taste

Thought Styles

First printed in 1970, Natural Symbols is Douglas' most controversial work. It represents a work of anthropology in its widest sense, exploring themes such as the social meaning of natural symbols and the image of the body in society. This work focuses on the ways in which cultures select natural symbols from the body and how every natural symbol carries a social meaning. She also introduces her grid/group theory, which she sees as a way of keeping together what the social sciences divide and separate. Bringing anthropology in to the realm of religion, Douglas enters into the ongoing debate in religious circles surrounding meaning and ritual. The book not only provides a clear explanation to four distinct attitudes to religion, but also defends hierarchical forms of religious organization and attempts to retain a balanced judgement between fundamentalism and established religion. Douglas has since extensively refined the grid/group theory and has applied it to consumer behaviour, labour movements and political parties.

Steven Ney

The Western cultural consensus based on the ideas of free markets and individualism has led many social scientists to consider poverty as a personal experience, a deprivation of material things, and a failure of just distribution. Mary Douglas and Steven Ney find this dominant tradition of social thought about poverty and well-being to be full of contradictions. They argue that the root cause is the impoverished idea of the human person inherited through two centuries of intellectual history, and that two principles, the idea of the solipsist self and the idea of objectivity, cause most of the contradictions. Douglas and Ney state that Economic Man, from its semitechnical niche in eighteenth-century economic theory, has taken over the realms of psychology, consumption, public assistance, political science, and philosophy. They say that by distorting the statistical data presented for policy analysis, the ideas of the solipsist self and objectivity indeed often protect a political bias. The authors propose to correct this by revising the current model of the person. Taking cultural bias into account and giving full play to political dissent, they restore the "persons" who have been missing from the social science debates. Drawing from anthropology, economics, political science, and sociology, the authors set forth a fundamental critique of the social sciences. Their book will find a wide audience among social scientists and will also interest anyone engaged in current discussions of poverty. This book is a copublication with the Russell Sage Foundation.

Mary Douglas

Books

Your next favorite book is out there