Mr.Haonan Qu

Ms.Aleksandra Zdzienicka

Davide Furceri

Mr.Shekhar Aiyar

Yi Ji

Mr.Romain A Duval

Daniel Garcia-Macia

Mr.John C Bluedorn

Davide Malacrino

Jesse Siminitz

Cross-country differences in economic resilience—in an economy’s ability to withstand and adjust to shocks—remain significant in the euro area. In part, the differences reflect the lack of a national nominal exchange rate as a mechanism to adjust to shocks. The IMF staff has argued that union-wide architectural changes such as the banking union, the capital markets union, and a central fiscal capacity can help foster greater international risk sharing. Yet even these changes cannot insure against all shocks. National policies thus have a vital role to play. This IMF staff discussion note analyzes how national structural policies can help euro area countries better deal with economic shocks. Using a mix of empirical and modeling approaches, the note finds that growth-enhancing reforms to labor and product market regulations, tailored to country-specific circumstances, would help individual euro area economies weather adverse shocks. Higher-quality insolvency regimes are associated with more efficient factor reallocation following a shock. The note also finds that structural and cyclical policies interact. Greater rigidities make economies more fragile, putting a higher burden on fiscal policy. This is especially true for members of a monetary union. Countries should build fiscal space in good times and tackle rigidities, reducing their need for countercyclical policies in bad times while making countercyclical policies more effective when deployed.

The Role of National Structural Reforms in Building Resilience

Strengthening the Euro Area

Zidong An

Mr.Davide Malacrino

Zsoka Koczan

Mr.JaeBin Ahn

Gabriele Ciminelli

Daniela Muhaj

Patricia Neidlinger

Economic development and growth depend on a country’s young people. With most of their working life ahead of them they make up about a third of the working-age population in the typical emerging market and developing economy. But the youth in these economies face a daunting labor market—about 20 percent of them are neither employed, in school, nor in training (the youth inactivity rate). This is double the share in the average advanced economy. Were nothing else to change, bringing youth inactivity in these economies down to what it is in advanced economies and getting those inactive young people into new jobs would have a striking effect. The working-age employment rate in the average emerging market and developing economy would rise more than 3 percentage points, and real output would get a 5 percent boost.

Improving Youth Labor Market Outcomes in Emerging Market and Developing Economies

Work In Progress

Mr.John C Bluedorn

Books

Your next favorite book is out there