Name: Ultra-Processed People
ISBN: 9781529160239

Chris van Tulleken

THE NUMBER ONE SUNDAY TIMES BESTESLLER 'If you only read one diet or nutrition book in your life, make it this one' Bee Wilson 'A devastating, witty and scholarly destruction of the shit food we eat and why' Adam Rutherford --- An eye-opening investigation into the science, economics, history and production of ultra-processed food. It's not you, it's the food. We have entered a new 'age of eating' where most of our calories come from an entirely novel set of substances called Ultra-Processed Food, food which is industrially processed and designed and marketed to be addictive. But do we really know what it's doing to our bodies? Join Chris in his travels through the world of food science and a UPF diet to discover what's really going on. Find out why exercise and willpower can't save us, and what UPF is really doing to our bodies, our health, our weight, and the planet (hint: nothing good). For too long we've been told we just need to make different choices, when really we're living in a food environment that makes it nigh-on impossible. So this is a book about our rights. The right to know what we eat and what it does to our bodies and the right to good, affordable food.

Why Do We All Eat Stuff That Isn’t Food ... and Why Can’t We Stop?

Ultra-Processed People

Will Dawson

In the past few decades, the replacement of traditional food with UPF has happened at a nearly unimaginable pace in terms of our evolutionary history. This is concerning because, in the hierarchy of biological life's activities, eating (along with reproduction) is right at the very top. Almost everything else we all do is in the service of these projects.

It's not food. It's an industrially produced edible substance.

Laura Dobie

Certainly, the traffic lights, the nutrition data tables, the HFSS designation all seem to represent a delusion about the way people choose and eat food. It's not just that no normal person can understand the information mixed in among the manufacturers' claims. The delusion is the idea that we can eat according to numbers rather than appetite.

The author goes on to make the case for the ongoing production of synthetic fat: 

‘Heavy workers cannot take in enough calories unless a fair proportion of them is in the form of fat ... This is especially important for those working the long shifts of modern industry without a rest pause for a full meal. The increase of fat consumption in all industrial countries during the last 100 years is, therefore, not a matter of taste only but a necessity of modern life, so I think it a good thing to continue research on synthetic fat.’ 

Here is the inexorable logic of all industrial food: to reduce the time workers require for a meal. I think about this every time I see a lunch-break meal deal. UPF crisps, UPF fizzy pop, UPF sandwich.

The model emphasises that powerful signals inside and outside the body influence food intake and energy balance far, far below the level of consciousness, involving slippery related ideas like salience, wanting, motivation and reward. We smear a conscious layer over all this, but eating is far less of a choice than it appears. 

This is one of the many reasons why simple advice like 'Eat less and move more!' is ineffective for sustained weight loss. It's as crazy as saying 'Drink less water!' to someone who's feeling thirsty.

Almost 90 per cent of hospital tooth extractions among children younger than five are due to preventable tooth decay, and tooth extraction is the most common hospital procedure in children aged six to ten.' The most common operation we do in children - ahead of fixing bones broken on trampolines, hernia repairs and appendix removals - is for rotten teeth. The statistics in the USA are even worse.

If we are active, our bodies compensate by using less energy on other things, so that our overall energy expenditure stays the same.

Pontzer's model posits that going for a long walk or run results in simply scaling back on routine non-essential bodily processes, reducing the amount of energy spent on your immune, endocrine, reproductive and stress systems. That may sound bad, but a bit of downtime actually seems to help to restore those systems to a healthier level of function.

'Some ultra-processed foods mnay activate the brain reward system in a way that is similar to what happens when people use drugs like alcohol, or even nicotine or morphine.’

This neuroscience is persuasive, if still in its early stages. There is a growing body of brain-scan data showing that energy-dense, hyperpalatable food (ultra-processed but probably also something a really good chef might be able to make) can stimulate changes in many of the same brain circuits and structures affected by addictive drugs.

Meals took on a uniformity: everything seemed similar, regardless of whether it was sweet or savoury. I was never hungry, but I was also never satisfied. The food developed an uncanny aspect, like a doll that looks just the wrong degree of realistic and ends up seeming corpselike.

There is an ethical question here as well. We spend around $2 billion on toxicology studies globally each year and kill around 100 million experimental animals. A single two-generation test for reproductive safety might use over 1,000 animals. I don't think that many of us think that food colouring is a good reason to kill this number of animals, but you don't find the number of animals killed to determine the possible safety of the additives written on the pack.

…animals are now fed fairly nutritious plants which humans could eat. 

It is well known that meat is less carbon efficient than plants as a source of food. Producing 100g of protein from beef emits at least 25kg of carbon dioxide, on average. Chicken produces far less, at 4-5kg of carbon dioxide per 100g, but we eat vastly more chicken than beef. Per 100g, tofu produces 1.6kg carbon dioxide, beans 0.65kg and peas 0.36kg. Some nuts are carbon negative even after transport, because tree nuts are replacing crops and taking carbon from the air.

Chicken is the most popular meat. Around 1 billion chickens are farmed each year in the UK (fifteen for every adult and child- double the global average), and 95 per cent of them are fast-growing breeds that are intensively reared indoors. Almost none are wandering around farmyards. And with bird flu meaning that flocks have to be kept indoors, free range' may be a thing of the past. 

The best way of making money from a chicken is to spend as little time caring for it as possible. If you keep a chicken as a pet, it will live for around six years. Yet birth-to-slaughter time for 95 per cent of the chicken we eat is just six weeks - less than 2 per cent of their natural lifespan.

If you're a company making a chicken sandwich, you'd be nuts to spend more than the bare minimum on the chicken. Chicken is chicken. Almost no one thinks about the meat in their UPF, how it is treated or how it affects the planet.

There is no 'biosecure' way of rearing animals that keeps the resistant bacteria from their faeces away from us. In the southern USA, intensive pork farms drain faecal waste into hog lagoons'. These are frequently aerosolised by tornadoes or overflow into water supply following storms. Flies carry microbes in and out of farms, and the microbes are found on our meat.

Tearfund looked at a sample of six countries (China, India, the Philippines, Brazil, Mexico and Nigeria) and determined that Coke creates 200, 000 tonnes of plastic waste - or about 8 billion bottles - which is burned or dumped each year in those countries alone - enough to cover thirty-three football pitches every day. Each year, globally, Coca-Cola produces 3 million tonnes of plastic waste, and we know that almost none of this is recycled. A staggering 91 per cent of all the plastic waste ever produced has not been recycled and has either been burned, put into landfill or is simply in the environment.

There's an illusion of food supply, but it's primarily a flow of money, driving ever-increasing complexity of processing.

Nestlé rehabilitated their reputation to the extent that George Clooney felt he could risk his by advertising Nespresso. But dangerous marketing of the type that the Jelliffes described in the early 1970s is still going on.

I sincerely don't have a moral opinion about eating UPF. None of my friends believe this, but it's true.I don't care how you feed yourself or your child. The goal should be that you live in a world where you have real choices and the freedom to make them.

This really resonates with me as I’ve been trying to look at Instagram less to stop myself from scrolling mindlessly and wasting time.

We are ultra-processed people not just because of the food we eat. Many of the other products we buy are engineered to drive excess consumption; our phones and apps, our clothes, our social media, our games and television. Sometimes these can feel like they take much more than they give. The requirement for growth and the harm it does to our bodies and our planet is so much part of the fabric of our world that it's nearly invisible. You may find that abstinence from some of these other products is helpful too.

Well written in plain language, extremely educational and balanced. 

Cassandra Tang

An easy to understand non-fic book which explains the health effect of UPF we eat everyday. 

p/s: I started eating fruits everyday since i read this book😂

Fasiha🌺🐧

An easy to understand non-fic book which explains the health effect of UPF we eat everyday. 

p/s: I started eating fruits everyday since i read this book😂

A fascinating account of ultra-processed foods and their health, ethical and environmental implications. It’s provided a lot of food for thought about the choices that we make, what drives our behaviour, and what’s lurking in my fridge.

A manifesto to change how you eat and how you think about the human body.

The Science Behind the Food That Isn't Food

Absolutely fascinating book about a facet of the world that is so commonplace (and deceptive) that you never really question it. 

I thoroughly enjoyed the topic of each chapter and the depth that Tulleken goes into the processing of food, the potential health impacts and even extraneous stuff surrounding it all like marketing and regulations, while keeping it simple enough for a non-expert to understand is brilliant.

Also I'd argue that the audiobook version is better since you get some lovely informal podcast-style interludes thrown in.

Anton Sten

Don’t think I can look at a Pringle the same again. 

This has already made me more conscious of the foods that I buy and what their true purpose is. I don’t feel like this book is out to give you some mystical answer to what a 

 diet is, but is instead created to arm you with the questions you should ask yourself whilst writing a shopping list or deciding what to have for lunch. 

Rarely do I come across things that I feel should be recommended reading, but this firmly falls into that category for me. 

Don’t think I can look at a Pringle the same again. 

This has already made me more conscious of the foods that I buy and what their true purpose is. I don’t feel like this book is out to give you some mystical answer to what a good diet is, but is instead created to arm you with the questions you should ask yourself whilst writing a shopping list or deciding what to have for lunch. 

Rarely do I come across things that I feel should be recommended reading, but this firmly falls into that category for me. 

Kebo

Nicole Elora

Jaclyn Rye

Navya R

Chris Van Tulleken

A manifesto to change how you eat and how you think about the human body.

It’s not you, it’s the food.

We have entered a new age of eating. For the first time in human history, most of our calories come from an entirely novel set of substances called Ultra-Processed Food. There’s a long, formal scientific definition, but it can be boiled down to this: if it’s wrapped in plastic and has at least one ingredient that you wouldn’t find in your kitchen, it’s UPF.

These products are specifically engineered to behave as addictive substances, driving excess consumption. They are now linked to the leading cause of early death globally and the number one cause of environmental destruction. Yet almost all our staple foods are ultra-processed. UPF is our food culture and for many people it is the only available and affordable food.

In this book, Chris van Tulleken, father, scientist, doctor, and award-winning BBC broadcaster, marshals the latest evidence to show how governments, scientists, and doctors have allowed transnational food companies to create a pandemic of diet-related disease. The solutions don’t lie in willpower, personal responsibility, or exercise. You’ll find no diet plan in this book―but join Chris as he undertakes a powerful self-experiment that made headlines around the world: under the supervision of colleagues at University College London he spent a month eating a diet of 80 percent UPF, typical for many children and adults in the United States. While his body became the subject of scientific scrutiny, he spoke to the world’s leading experts from academia, agriculture, and―most important―the food industry itself. But more than teaching him about the experience of the food, the diet switched off Chris’s own addiction to UPF.

In a fast-paced and eye-opening narrative he explores the origins, science, and economics of UPF to reveal its catastrophic impact on our bodies and the planet. And he proposes real solutions for doctors, for policy makers, and for all of us who have to eat. A book that won’t only upend the way you shop and eat, Ultra-Processed People will open your eyes to the need for action on a global scale.

Ultra-Processed People Why Do We All Eat Stuff That Isn’t Food ... and Why Can’t We Stop?